Unpaid: a culture of talent exploitation

Guy Lambert says that, by advertising for unpaid work, some media companies are exploiting the hopes and dreams of aspiring presenters for the benefit of their shareholders.

Recently we have seen major corporations facing public backlash for their unfair use of unemployed labour. I am sure that you will agree that people working for a commercial, profit-making company for free is an unacceptable practice, comparable to slave labour in its exploitation of the vulnerable.

The media industry is often viewed by the public as being ‘different’ to others: there is a perception that it is glamorous, well-paid and therefore somehow set apart from other industries. For those of us working in it we know that this is untrue: a runner may well get to mingle with a celebrity or two, but he or she may well end up working hours equivalent to a Junior Doctor. Of course we’re not saving lives, but we are all doing a job for the same reason everyone else works: to pay our bills, raise our children, and have food on our tables. In employment law, we all stand equal.

It is therefore completely unacceptable that a number of profit-making commercial companies still feel they have the right to create unpaid jobs. It is important to be clear that this is different than work experience: I am referring to roles that are long-term jobs, filled by people at the expense of those who seek a living from their skills. Rather than creating employment, it is creating a culture of talent exploitation based on the promise of future gain, but with no present reward. In fact, it is creating a culture of unemployment.

As someone who champions aspiring presenters, it is my concern that some companies are exploiting these people’s hopes and dreams for the benefit of their shareholders. While it may be true that some companies are run at a loss, it does not give them the right to hire unpaid staff purely because their business model is flawed. Moreover, it does not give them the right to pay their managers, engineers and cleaners, but not pay their presenters.

I am sure you will agree that this kind of activity is not only immoral, but as a responsible advertiser you will know that it is also illegal. I refer you to this excellent summary of the situation from theunitlist.com.

In my opinion, we all need to reaffirm our commitment by continuing to refuse to advertise these roles. We need to tell our subscribers, Twitter followers, and Facebook fans that we will not be a conduit through which people are exploited for the benefit of other people’s profit, however ‘generous’ the offer of experience may at first appear.

It is important that we stand together on this, and I thank you for your hard work in ensuring we protect the people in our industry. If you would like to make a statement about your own policy on this matter, I would be very happy to bring it to people’s attention.

Media UK does not publish advertisements for unpaid jobs for any commercial company. read our policy

Guy has worked in television since 1997, and has produced magazine, entertainment and children's programmes for broadcasters including Sky, Nickelodeon, Disney and the BBC. He offers TV presenting advice for aspiring presenters.
|

  
 

4 comments

Recommendations: 0
James Cridland
posted on Wednesday 22nd February 2012 at 15:52

This isn’t just TV either: there’s a great post from Dan Siron in our print discussion board

Recommendations: 0
Michael Cook
posted on Wednesday 22nd February 2012 at 16:01

I’m not trying to be smart, but did you pay Guy for that article, James?

Recommendations: 0
James Cridland
posted on Wednesday 22nd February 2012 at 19:07

Michael – we didn’t, no: we asked Guy whether we could reprint a post he’d already made on his Posterous account. The total amount of work that Guy has done here is respond to the tweet we sent him, saying “hey, yes, absolutely, that would be great”.

Recommendations: 0
Guy Lambert
posted on Wednesday 22nd February 2012 at 20:34

Absolutely. I had already written it for my blog and James has reprinted it. Had James commissioned me to write it, that would’ve been a different matter.

Add your comment in seconds

Use a social media account you already have to log in. More info

If you're not on social media, register for a Media UK account.
By logging in, you are consenting to a cookie that personally identifies you to us. Here's more about our cookies.

Get the Media UK Daily
Get new articles, news, jobs and discussions every day into your inbox. Subscribe, free, now
Log inWelcome! 

Get new articles daily

We can send you new articles, news, jobs and discussions every day into your inbox.